Ambiances, demain | Ambiances, tomorrow | Ατμόσφαιρες, Αύριο
3rd International Congress on Ambiances
Department of Architecture, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, 21-24 September 2016
![]() Visit the website of the congress | ||||
Ambiances, demainDepuis plus de 40 ans, la question des ambiances architecturales et urbaines occupe un grand nombre de chercheurs, de concepteurs et d’artistes en Europe et à travers le monde. L’essor important et continu du travail du ![]() Si le premier congrès en 2008 à Grenoble s’est attaché à fédérer une communauté et à faire état des travaux, des recherches et des pratiques sur la création et la fabrication des ambiances architecturales et urbaines (Faire une ambiance, dir. Jean-François Augoyard), le second congrès en 2012 à Montréal a pu identifier ses dimensions pratiques voire praxéologiques, qu’elles soient d’ordre architecturales, urbaines, sociales, esthétiques, artistiques, politiques, techniques, environnementales ou pédagogiques (Ambiances en acte(s), dir. Jean-Paul Thibaud et Daniel Siret). Cette dernière rencontre a permis ainsi de dresser une cartographie raisonnée de l’usage et des champs où opère la notion. Le troisième congrès sera donc l’occasion d’inscrire la notion d’ambiance (ou d’atmosphère) dans une dynamique prospective et de montrer comment elle peut devenir un opérateur des transformations de nos habitats, de nos villes et de nos sociétés. Ce futur des ambiances peut dès lors être interrogé selon une triple perspective à travers ses dimensions pragmatiques, théoriques et prospectives. | Ambiances, tomorrowFor the past 40 years, a large number of researchers, designers and artists in Europe and throughout the world have been focusing on the issue of architectural and urban ambiances. The increasing and enduring importance of the The Third Congress will be used to circumscribe the notion of ambiance (or atmosphere) in a dynamic prospective and demonstrate how it can become an operator in transforming our habitats, cities and societies. So, the future of ambiances can be analysed according to a three-fold perspective in terms of its pragmatic, theoretical and prospective dimensions. | |||
| ||||
Une notion mature, un usage toujours renouvelé (dimension pragmatique)Si la notion d’ambiance a montré à l’échelle internationale sa capacité à rassembler une communauté et faire progresser les savoirs et les savoir-faire, il s’agit aujourd’hui d’analyser rétrospectivement cette évolution, de continuer à témoigner de son champ d’action actuel et d’interroger son devenir. Autrement dit, si le deuxième congrès a permis de répondre à la question : Quels usages faisons-nous aujourd’hui de la notion d’ambiance ? Nous proposons que le troisième congrès complète cette question par la suivante : quels usages se profilent aujourd’hui pour penser et concevoir demain l’architecture, la ville et les territoires au prisme de cette notion ? De nombreux chercheurs et concepteurs empruntent des outils issus de disciplines souvent étanches entre elles pour concevoir des espaces et produire des expériences. L’idée même de concepteur et de sujet-actant se mélange dans la mesure où les compétences sont de plus en plus partagées. Les outils contemporains tant en sciences sociales, qu’en conception, ainsi que l’apparition des outils numériques et des technologies embarquées, invitent aussi aujourd’hui à réinterroger les séparations entre analyse, projet et fabrication. En ce sens, la question même de la traduction des ambiances (entre les sens, les disciplines, les acteurs, les langues) se doit d’être abordée en tant que telle. | A mature notion with constantly renewed usage (pragmatic dimension)While the notion of ambiance has demonstrated its capacity to forge an international community and move knowledge and expertise forward, the time has come to analyse these developments, continue showcasing achievements and analyse the whole future of the concept. In other words, the Second Congress provided an answer to "What use do we currently make of the notion of ambiance?" We propose that the Third Congress be used to round out this question with another one, namely, what uses are currently emerging that enable us to envisage and design tomorrow's architecture, city and regions through the prism of the notion of ambiances. Numerous researchers and designers draw upon applications from disciplines separated by strict boundaries to design spaces and conduct experiments. The very idea of the designer and subject-agent blend into one insofar as expertise is increasingly widely shared. Contemporary applications in both the social sciences and design, as well as the emergence of digital applications and on-board technologies are also an invitation to re-examine the split between analysis, project and production. As such, the very question of translating ambiances (between senses, disciplines, actors and languages) needs to be tackled head-on. | |||
| ||||
Nouveaux positionnements et hybridations inédites (dimension théorique)L’évolution des usages, des outils et des techniques afférentes à la question des ambiances est le témoin quotidien d’une hybridation de plus en plus forte entre les disciplines. Quelles sont ces disciplines qui travaillent aujourd’hui sur la notion d’ambiance ? Comment en redéfinissent-elles son contour, ses fondements, ses outils et ses représentations ? Comment, où et dans quelles perspectives se pensent aujourd’hui les notions d’ambiance et d’atmosphère ? La notion d’ambiance par essence interdisciplinaire provoque ainsi une porosité d’usages entre ses disciplines et ses acteurs, comme autant d’expérimentations et d’expériences. On regardera en particulier ces évolutions au regard de plusieurs champs riches de travaux : le champ de la théorie et de la critique architecturale, le champ des recherches sur la condition urbaine et territoriale, le champ des recherches sur l’environnement construit et le champ ouvert de l’écologie (écologie de la perception, écologie de l’attention, écologie sociale). | New unprecedented positioning and hybridation (theoretical dimension)Changing uses and applications of ambiance-related technologies are daily testimony to increasing inter-disciplinary hybridation. What disciplines are currently focused on the notion of ambiance? How can we redefine their contours, fundamentals, tools and representations? How, where and towards what end do we currently perceive notions of ambiance and atmosphere? The – essentially inter-disciplinary – notion of ambiance has led to an increasing degree of porosity in uses between disciplines and their stakeholders as well as a similar range of experiments. In particular, we will examine these developments with regard to a number of fertile research fields: architectural theory and criticism, research into urban and territorial conditions, research into the built environment, and the open-ended field of ecology (ecology of perception, ecology of attention and social ecology). | |||
| ||||
Ambiances en devenir – le monde hier, aujourd’hui et demain (dimension prospective)Le monde change, tant dans ses formes construites, que dans les façons de les vivre et de les habiter. L’économie et la politique peuvent changer radicalement et parfois violemment des situations que l’on croyait établies. Le climat et l’environnement évoluent. Les territoires se transforment et les cadres de la vie quotidienne subissent sans nul doute aujourd’hui des évolutions majeures. Que ce soit à l’échelle du privé ou du public, l’espace sensible se transforme autant dans ses formes d’apparition que dans ses formes d’activation. Le numérique et l’espace physique trouvent de plus en plus d’hybridations inédites. L’évolution des techniques et des savoir-faire renouvellent autant les modes d’installation des ambiances que ses modes de saisie. Comment la notion d’ambiance aide-t-elle à penser et à agir sur ces changements ? Entre prospective réaliste et prospective utopiste, quelles ambiances se profilent pour demain ? Quel devenir ambiant pour le monde ? Cette question a naturellement son symétrique, comment saisir les ambiances du passé et rétrospectivement comment se pensaient hier les ambiances du futur ? Entre le temps court, mais marquant des évènements et le temps long des changements, comment saisir l’évolution des ambiances ? | Evolving ambiances – the world yesterday, today and tomorrow (prospective dimension)The world is changing, both in its built forms and in ways of living in, and inhabiting them. Economics and politics can change radically and sometimes violently in situations we had considered to be stable. The climate and the environment are changing. Territories are being transformed and day-to-day living spaces are undoubtedly undergoing major change. In both the private and the public sphere, sensorial space is being transformed both in appearance and in its forms of activation. There is an increasing degree of crossover between digital and physical space. Changing techniques and know-how renew the ways in which ambiances appear and how they are perceived. How does the notion of ambiance help in analysing and impacting upon these changes? What ambiances lie along the horizon between a realistic and utopian perspective? What is the world's ambiantal future? Naturally the symmetrical question to this one is how do we gauge the ambiances of the past and, retrospectively, how were the ambiances of the future perceived in the past? How can we gauge how ambiances are changing between the short- term with its forceful impact, and longer-term changes? | |||
La tenue du troisième congrès sera donc l’occasion de montrer et de mettre en débat au sein de la communauté scientifique, de celle des concepteurs et des artistes comment ces évolutions esquissent à leurs manières le futur des ambiances notamment dans les façons dont elles sont et seront conçues, vécues, senties et pratiquées. | The Third Congress will therefore provide the scientific community, designers and artists with an opportunity to showcase and debate how these developments trace out the future of ambiances and especially how they will be conceived, experienced, felt and practised. | |||
| ||||
Responsables scientifiques
Département d’Architecture de l’École Polytechnique de l’Université de Thessalie, Volos, Grèce
CRESSON, UMR CNRS AAU, Ecole nationale supérieure d'architecture de Grenoble, France Pour toute information, écrivez un message à ![]() | Chairmen
Department of Architecture of the Polytechnic School of the University of Thessaly, in Volos, Greece
CRESSON, UMR CNRS AAU, Graduate School of Architecture of Grenoble, France For more information, send e-mail to ![]() |
Le congrès est organisé conjointement par :
Cette initiative est soutenue par :
| The Congress is organized jointly by:
This initiative is supported by:
|
|

|
Congress coordination | Direction du congrès
Organizing Committee | Comité d’organisation
Theme development | Rédaction des themes
Scientific Committee | Comité scientifique
- Adey Peter, Royal Holloway, London, England
- Albersten Niels, Aarhus School of Architecture, Aarhus, Denmark
- Amphoux Pascal, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Anderson Ben, Durham University ‐ Department of Geography, Durham, England
- Atienza Ricardo, University College of Arts, Crafts & Design, Stockholm, Sweden
- Augoyard Jean‐François, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Barles Sabine, University Paris 1 Panthéon‐Sorbonne, Paris, France
- Ben Ayed Alia, ENAU Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
- Berenstein‐Jacques Paula, Universidade Federal do Bahia, Bahia, Brazil
- Berleant Arnold, Long Island University, New‐York City, United State of American
- Böhme Gernot, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Bonnet Aurore, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Bossé Anne, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Bubaris Nikos, Aegean University, Mytilini, Greece
- Bourdakis Vassilis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Brayer Laure, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Breviglieri Marc, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, Genève, Suisse
- Bertolino Monica, Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Córdoba, Argentina
- Bitsikas Xenofon, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Carles José‐Luis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
- Charitos Dimitris, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
- Chelkoff Grégoire, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Cuadra Manuel, Universität Kassel, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Colafranceschi Daniela, Univ. Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy
- Demers Claude, GRAP – UQUAM, Quebec, Canada
- Depeau Sandrine, ESO ‐ UMR CNRS, Rennes, France
- Devisme Laurent, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Duarte Cristiane, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janero, Brazil
- Dultra‐Bitto Fabiana, Universidade Federal do Bahia, Savlador de Bahia, Brazil
- Giannisi Phoebe, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Griffero Tonino, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italie
- Hasse Jürgen, J. Wolfgang Goethe‐Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
- Howes David, Concordia University, Canada
- Ingold Tim, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
- Joanne Pascal, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Kakalis Christos P., School of Architecture and Landscape, Edinburgh, England
- Kanarelis Theoklis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Kazig Rainer, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Kuriakoulakos Panagiotis, University of the Aegean Syros, Greece
- Kytö, Meri, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Kanellopoulos Panagiotis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Kivelou Stella, Politic and Communication Sciences of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Koivumaki Aris, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere, Finland
- Kouros Panos, University of Patra, Patras, Greece
- Labussière Olivier, UMR PACTE, Grenoble, France
- Laplantine François, University of Lyon 2 Lumière, Lyon, France
- Laskaris Nikolaos, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Lazaridis Pantelis, Université of Thessaly, Volos Grèce
- Leduc Thomas, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Liveneau Philippe, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Manolidis Kostas, University of Thessaly, Volos, Grèce
- Mantzou Polyxeni, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece
- Mantziaras Panagiotis, Fondation Braillard Architectes, Genève, Suisse
- Masson Damien, University of Cergy‐Pontoise, Paris, France
- Meigneux Guillaume, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Melemis Steven, UMR AUSSER, Paris, France
- Meziou Olfa, ENAU Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
- Morello Eugenio, Polytechnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Moraitis Constantinos, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Núñez Adolfo, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
- Okamura Cintia, CETESB, São Paulo, Brazil
- Papadopoulos Spiros, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Papakonstantinou Georges, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Papadimitriou Spiros I., University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Pecqueux Anthony, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Péneau Jean‐Pierre, ENAU Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
- Pichon Pascale, University Jean Monnet, St‐Etienne, France
- Piga Barbara E.A., Polytechnico di Milano, Milan, Italia
- Pinheiro Ethel, FAU/UFRJ, Rio de Janero, Brazil
- Pousin Frédéric, UMR AUSSER, Paris, France
- Psychoulis Alexandros, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Remy Nicolas, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Requena Ruiz Ignacio, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, Nantes, France
- Rodriguez‐Alcalà Carolina, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Saïd Noha, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Shusterman Richard, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA
- Simmonot Nathalie, LéaV ‐ ENSA Versailles, Versailles, France
- Simpson Paul, Plymouth University, Plymouth, England
- Siret Daniel, CRENAU ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Nantes, Nantes, France
- Spiridonidis Constantin‐Victor, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Thibaud Jean‐Paul, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Thomas Rachel, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Tixier Nicolas, CRESSON ‐ UMR AAU, ENSA Grenoble & ESAAA, Grenoble, France
- Tsangrasoulis Aris, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Tragaki Daphnée, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Tsinikas Nikolaos, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Uimonen Heikki, Sibelius Academy, Helsinki, Finland
- Vrontissi Maria, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Vyzoviti Sophia, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
- Xagoraris Zafos, Athens School of Fine Arts, Athens, Greece
- Zardini Mirko, Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montreal, Canada
- Zerbib David, ESAA Annecy, France
|
Appel à communicationsLes propositions retenues amènent des éléments de réponses et de débat à la thématique générale Ambiances, demain à travers 6 thématiques.
1. Expériences et expérimentations des ambiances Cette thématique interroge prioritairement les ambiances en terme d'expérience et d'expérimentation. Les notions d'expérimentation et d'expérience sont centrales dans la recherche sur les ambiances, car elles posent une double question : celle leur saisie et celle de leur effectuation. Expérimenter l’ambiance c’est autant être capable d’en prendre acte, que de pouvoir la manipuler, la fabriquer. En quoi cette confrontation expérimentale, partagée par le monde scientifique et par les actions artistiques, est apte à faire penser et agir, à faire surgir des singularités imprévues qui peuvent renouveler notre rapport au monde et au faire – tant dans les processus de conception que dans l’actualisation permanente d’une situation ? Poser la question des ambiances en termes d'expérimentation ouvre de nouveaux possibles en interrogeant les multiples normes techniques, sociales ou esthétiques en vigueur. Partant de l'exploration et de la fabrication d'espaces et d'usages, il s'agit d'expliciter les modalités, processus et objets supports d'expérimentation. Cette session appelle ainsi des contributions qui d'une manière ou d'une autre reposent sur des travaux et des recherches mettant en œuvre différentes formes d'expérience, soit à travers une production spécifique (espace, dispositif, objet matériel, œuvre, site, support...) permettant de modifier volontairement un milieu, soit à partir de situations saisies comme témoins expérimentaux croisant les dimensions physiques, sensibles et sociales. 2. Traces, notations, représentations des ambiances En considérant les trois termes « traces », « notations » et « représentations », séparément ou bien ensemble en tant que processus, comment se saisit-on et donne-t-on à saisir les ambiances, leurs qualités matérielles, immatérielles et muables dans une perspective où les territoires, les espaces, l’environnement subissent d’énormes modifications (urbanisme, climat, etc.) ? Quelles traces laisse l’expérience des ambiances et quelles traces peut-on laisser de cette expérience? À quelles formes et expériences de notation(s) et de représentation(s) la recherche sur les ambiances peut-elle faire appel dans la perspective d’un « avenir des ambiances » ? Aujourd’hui, un réel enjeu pour le futur des ambiances se trouve certainement à ce moment d’entrée en projet, ce moment où recherche et conception se recoupent. Au regard des traces, notations et autres représentations, tout exercice d’expression des ambiances ne serait-il pas un moment opérant par lequel se fait le lien à la conception, à cette posture dont la tâche délicate est de concevoir des espaces et avec cela produire des expériences ? Qu’est-ce qui, dans une ambiance, est représentable ? De quelle(s) manière(s) et à travers quels médias et médiums peut-on produire une expression des ambiances ? 3. Projeter et fabriquer les ambiances de demain Le monde qui nous environne est en adaptation permanente. Personnes, lieux et informations sensorielles interagissent dans un dialogue illimité. Les nouvelles manières d’envisager la matérialité et la virtualité du monde, encore en gestation aujourd’hui, permettront certainement de produire des expériences architecturales et urbaines inédites, tant par des solutions personnalisées que par des offres plus globales. Quelles parts la mobiquité (mobilité + ubiquité) et la réalité augmentée ou médiatisée prendront-elles dans cette réorganisation des interactions du sujet à son environnement sensible ? Quelles adaptations peut-on espérer pour le citoyen sensible à son milieu et à son environnement social ? Le tout-phygital (physique + digital) est-il l’avenir du monde ? Comment ces évolutions participent-elles de la transformation des processus de conception et des méthodologies de projet ? Comment ces évolutions contribuent-elles à renouveler le cadre même de la production architecturale ? Comment les concepteurs s’approprient-ils l'hybridation des mondes numériques et physiques dans leurs projets et comment les nouveaux outils numériques renouvellent-ils la conception des ambiances du monde en devenir ? 4. Ambiance, atmosphère, climat : théorie, politique et critique Les questionnements méthodologiques de saisie des ambiances sont ici liés à des enjeux théoriques et critiques. Nous invitons à les expliciter, en interrogeant notamment les portées respectives des notions d’ambiances, d’atmosphères et de climats. Les ambiances nous affectent politiquement. Certaines « dissonances » atmosphériques, d’ambiances suscitent parfois des émotions et des désaccords très forts. Dit autrement, la puissance atmosphérique/d’ambiance affecte nos comportements tout en restant difficile à saisir et à expliciter. Les atmosphères sont partagées, mais peuvent diviser. Les villes, les paysages urbains, les pays sont traversés par les politiques, les puissances et les résistances atmosphériques. Comment les décrire, les conceptualiser, les théoriser, les critiquer ? Printemps arabes, mouvements des Indignés, « Occupy Wall Street », marches républicaines, manifestations contre les politiques d’austérité économique en Europe..., les espaces publics urbains contemporains donnent partout à voir et à entendre des appels citoyens à «changer le monde». Si ces campements pacifistes et/ou ces marches collectives bénéficient d’un large relais médiatique – teintant ainsi l’espace télévisuel, radiophonique ou le World Wide Web de tonalités particulières – d’autres mouvements ou pratiques, moins manifestes ou volontaires, plus discrets, relevant parfois de la sphère privée, participent d’une reconfiguration lente des cadres sensibles de l’expérience urbaine et des urbanités contemporaines. Comment se saisir et décrire ces mutations à l’œuvre, dont la plupart relèvent de processus longs, en cours, inachevés et qui, en outre, sont porteurs d’enjeux sociopolitiques complexes ? De quelle manière l’attention à la dimension sociopolitique des ambiances/des atmosphères peut-elle nourrir une réflexion critique sur le devenir sensible du monde urbain ? 5. Ambiances et territoires en transformation Les sociétés contemporaines se trouvent plus que jamais dans une dynamique de changement qui touche la production de l'espace et les modes de vie. En particulier, la globalisation et la digitalisation peuvent être considérées comme deux moteurs importants de cette dynamique qui ne cesse de transformer les territoires urbains, leurs périphéries, ainsi que les mondes ruraux. Dans ce cadre nous souhaitons mettre en question la dimension sensible de ces évolutions, d’une part en interrogeant leurs effets sur l’environnement et les pratiques, mais aussi pour envisager les rôles (techniques, politiques, performatifs, etc.) des ambiances dans la fabrique des territoires de demain. Pour cela, trois axes nous semblent particulièrement intéressants. Le premier concerne la production des territoires et la construction des discours et images relatifs à leur compétitivité. Le second se focalise sur les espaces produits et l’ordinaire des situations qu’il rend possible et vise à mettre en question leurs capacités d’inclusion ou d’exclusion des habitants. Il interroge également la superposition des mondes et des spatialités réels et virtuels, dans l’expérience vécue des lieux. Enfin, le dernier axe vise les échelles, spatiales et temporelles, concernées par ces transformations et leurs implications pour la compréhension du devenir de ces territoires. 6. L’ambiance comme patrimoine du futur Peut-on « patrimonialiser » une ambiance, c’est-à-dire garantir le maintien de qualités éphémères et immatérielles d’un lieu pour le transformer physiquement ? Ou plutôt : peut-on « patrimonialiser » un territoire par l’Ambiance, c’est-à-dire en transformer certains aspects physiques sans détruire l’esprit du lieu et sa manière de faire territoire ? On connaît les effets de folklorisation, de déshumanisation ou de perte d’authenticité que génèrent des protections substantielles trop exclusives, des changements d’usage trop radicaux ou des reconstitutions historiques trop parfaites. On a protégé la matière, mais on en a fait une image ou une pure représentation – et l’on en a détruit l’ambiance (cf. l’usage que font de la notion les politiques de tourisme culturel ou le marketing sensoriel). On connaît à l’inverse certaines opérations de reconversion architecturale ou de réhabilitation urbaine qui préservent les qualités des bâtiments ou des rues d’origine tout en leur apportant les améliorations nécessaires à une vie contemporaine. Elles confortent une mémoire sensible avec l’évolution nécessaire des sociétés et de ses édifices. L’ambiance n’est-elle pas alors par excellence l’instrument de patrimonialisation du futur ? En d’autres termes, l’hypothèse de cet axe thématique pourrait être formulée ainsi. « Faire patrimoine », c'était hier classer des « objets architecturaux » pour en protéger la substance matérielle, c'est aujourd'hui déjà identifier des « entités urbaines » pour en préserver le substrat immatériel, ce pourrait être demain augmenter des « ambiances territoriales » pour en promouvoir la pérennité à travers des formes et des modes de vie contemporains. | Call for PapersThe selected proposals bring partial responses and arguments relating to the general theme of the Ambiances, tomorrow via six themes. Particular interest was given to proposals that provide for possible cross-over and hybridation between various different fields and expertise:
This theme focuses primarily on ambiances in terms of experiences and experiments. Such notions are key to research into ambiances because they pose a dual question about how to gauge ambiances and how to effect them. Experiencing ambiance is as much about being able to act as being able to manipulate or manufacture it.How is such comparative experimentation shared by the scientific community and by artistic initiatives suitable for encouraging thought and action and for highlighting unexpected singularities that could renew our relationship with the world and with doing – both in design processes and in the constant updating of a situation? Framing the question of ambiances in terms of experimentation opens new possibilities by focusing on multiple technical, social or aesthetic standards currently in force. Starting with an exploration and production of spaces and uses, the focus is on clarifying arrangements, processes and experimentation support media. This session seeks contributions that are underpinned in some way or other by research highlighting different forms of experience, either through a specific type of production (space, arrangement, materiel object, work, site, medium, etc.) that makes it possible to deliberately alter a habitat, or through practical experiments that combine physical, sensorial and social dimensions. 2. Traces, notations and representations of ambiances If we take the three terms "traces", "notations" and "representations" either separately or together as processes, how can we gauge ambiances – or have them gauged – in terms of their tangible, intangible and mutable qualities within a perspective in which territories, spaces and the environment are experiencing huge changes (urbanism, climate, etc.)? What traces do experiences of ambiances leave and what traces can we leave of such experiences? What experiences of notations and representation(s) can research draw upon within the perspective of a "future of ambiances"? At the present time, when there is an overlap between research and design in the pre-project phase, there is a genuine window of opportunity for the future of ambiances. In the light of traces, ratings and other representations, would any expression of ambiances not be an operative moment that forges a link with design and with this posture whose tricky task it is to design spaces and use these to produce experiences. What is actually representable in an ambiance? How and by means of which media may we produce an expression of ambiances? 3. Projecting and manufacturing the ambiances of tomorrow The world around us is in a constant state of adaptation. People, places and sensorial information interact as part of an unlimited dialogue. The new ways of envisaging the materiality and virtuality of our still-gestating world will undoubtedly make it possible to produce unprecedented architectural and urban experiences in terms of both tailored solutions and more comprehensive offerings. What part will mobiquity (mobility + ubiquity) and augmented reality play in these restructured interactions of the subject with its sensorial environment? What adaptations may we expect for the sensorial citizen vis-à-vis his or her social environment? Is the future of the world all-phygital (physical + digital)? How are these changes transforming design processes and project methodologies? How do they contribute to renewing the very framework of architectural production? How do designers3appropriate the hybridation of digital and physical universes in their projects and how do these new digital applications renew the conception of ambiances in tomorrow's world? 4. Ambiance, atmosphere, climate: theory, politics and criticism Methodological issues on how to gauge ambiances are related to theoretical and critical imperatives. We invite participants to clarify them, especially the respective reach of the notions of ambiance, atmosphere and climate. Ambiances affect us politically. Certain atmospheric "dissonances" can sometimes trigger strong emotions and disagreements. In other words, a highly-charged atmosphere/ambiance affects our behaviour while remaining difficult to gauge and to describe clearly. Atmospheres are shared but they can divide. Cities, urban landscapes and countries are criss-crossed by atmospheric charges, powers and resistance. How can we describe, conceptualise, theorise and criticise these? The Arab Spring, indigenous movements, Occupy Wall Street, Republican protests in France, anti-austerity protests in Europe, etc. – contemporary urban public spaces everywhere are being used to hear and relay the calls of citizens to "change the world". Although these peaceful occupations and/or collective marches enjoy a large media echo and lend a particular tone to the televisual or radio landscape or to the World Wide Web – other less obvious or proactive movements with a lower profile, and sometimes emanating from the private sphere, are helping to slowly reconfigure the sensorial framework of the urban experience and contemporary urbanites. How is it possible to gauge and describe these transformations at work when most of them are part of long, pending or incomplete processes underpinned by complex socio-political issues? How can a focus on the socio-political dimension of ambiances/atmospheres foster a critical reflection concerning the sensorial evolution of the urban world? 5. Ambiances and territories in transformation Contemporary societies are now more than ever in a dynamic of change that impacts the production of space and lifestyles. In particular, globalisation and digitisation can be seen as two key vectors in this dynamic that ceaselessly transforms urban territories and their periphery as well as rural areas. We wish to tease out the sensorial dimension of these changes, firstly by analysing their impacts on the environment and practices and also in order to envisage the roles (technical, political, performative, etc.) of ambiances in the production of tomorrow's territories. We believe three avenues are particularly worth exploring in this respect. The first concerns the production of territories and constructing approaches and images concerning their competitiveness. The second focuses on the spaces produced and the day-to-day situations rendered possible and seeks to analyse their capacity for including or excluding inhabitants. It also examines the overlap between different worlds and between real and virtual spatialities in the experience of places. Lastly, the third avenue focuses on the spatial and temporal scales concerned by these transformations and their implications for understanding how these territories are set to evolve. 6. Ambiance as heritage of the future Can we make ambiance part of heritage? In other words, can we safeguard the ephemeral and intangible qualities of a place in order to transform it physically? Or, put another way, can we make a territory part of heritage through ambiance, i.e., transform certain physical aspects without destroying the spirit of the place and the way in which it "makes" territory? We are familiar with the effects of folklorisation, dehumanisation or loss of authenticity that stem from over-exclusive comprehensive protective measures, radical changes in use or historical reconstructions that are just too perfect. We succeed in protecting the material itself but we have turned it into an image or a pure representation and we have destroyed the ambiance (take, for example, the use to which the notion is put in cultural tourism policies or in sensorial marketing). But we also know of certain architectural reconversion or urban renovation projects that do succeed in preserving the quality of the original buildings or streets while also adding in the improvements necessary for contemporary day-to-day living. They reinforce a sensorial memory in line with the necessary evolution of societies and their edifices. So, is ambiance not the instrument par excellence for constituting the heritage of the future? To put it another way, the contention underlying this thematic focus could be expressed as follows: "Constituting heritage" previously consisted of classifying "architectural objects" to protect their tangible substance; nowadays, it involves identifying "urban entities" in order to preserve their intangible substrate, and tomorrow it may very well consist in enhancing "territorial ambiances" to safeguard them over time through contemporary forms and lifestyles. |
|
Sessions parallèles | Parallel Sessions
|
Dialogues | Dialogues
|
Sim[pli]city
|
Ephemeral library
|
Volos Transect
|
Thematic Workshops
|
Concert & Performances
|
Exhibition
|
Excursion the Great Volos

|
Jean-Paul Thibaud
The ambient becoming of the urban world
The growing interest in ambiances and atmospheres is a hint: our sensitivity to inhabited spaces is indeed changing. What about ambiances in the understanding and the transformation of our sensory conditions of existence? Are we not witnessing the emergence of a new ecology of the senses more attentive to the atmospheric existence of our forms of life? Can we speak of an ambient becoming of the urban world? Asking such questions enables to reveal the powers of ambiances, to highlight what they perform and reflect upon urbanity.Rather than approaching ambiance as a closed domain of research, we will draw a few lines of flight to help us navigate within this moving ocean: a line of meeting will focus on the various processes of aestheticisation that cross and foreshadow an urban ecology of ambiances; a line of existence will wonder why ambiance is so elusive and why it resists any final determination; a line of paradox will articulate the vital and emotional strength of ambiance and its ability to influence and control; a line of questioning will take the measure of the plurality of the paradigms of ambiance and will question their dialogue and difference; a line of effectuation will accompany ambiance within its material fabric, its effective practices and its scientific uses.
The proposal will be very general, not deepening a particular problem, nor looking for any exhaustive references and pieces of work. Instead, we aim at building a dynamic framework which could provide a basic orientation. We contend that the notion of ambiance operates as an analyser and operator of urban transformations. The purpose will be deliberately exploratory and prospective. The emphasis will focus on the transversal and nomadic characters of the notion of ambiance... on its efficience and modus operandi... on its lesser existence, discreet and subthreshold ...
Biography
Jean-Paul Thibaud, sociologist, is Senior Researcher at CNRS. He is researcher at CRESSON research laboratory (Research Center on Sonic Space and the Urban Environment, UMR 1563 Ambiances Architectures Urbanités). His field of research covers the theory of urban ambiances, ordinary perception in urban environment, sensory culture and ethnography of public places, anthropology of sound, in situ qualitative methodology. In 2008 Jean-Paul Thibaud has founded the International Ambiances Network (www.ambiances.net). He has recently published a book entitled En quête d'ambiances. Eprouver la ville en passant (Geneva: MétisPresses, 2015)
|
Prodromos Nikoforidis and Bernard Cuomo
paralia_zo
The development project of the New Sea Side in Thessaloniki is all about the adventure of meeting a place. It is also a dialogue, because in the concept, the generosity of the context, the moods associated to natural phenomenato of the place are essential. So, it was to testify through this somewhat constant fascination confrontation that provides the landscape and its variations.
A public space is nevertheless not only a place of contemplation. It is now a place of life and use that belongs to everyone, but also to each. Attendance, ownership phenomena and citizen initiatives contribute to realize the nature of this space and infuse its vitality.
Biography
Prodromos Nikiforidis and Bernard Cuomo are working together since 1986. Their common path started from the architectural school of Toulouse in the early 80s.
In 1986, they participated in their first architectural competition. Notable among the projects to date: Residential building in Paris 1992-1994, Cultural Centre and Theatre in Menemeni Thessaloniki 1997, Technopolis Thessaloniki from 2006 to 2009, the Treasury of the Bank of Greece in Thessaloniki from 2001 to 2009 and the New Restructuration of the Beach in Thessaloniki 2000 -2014.
In 2009 they were awarded by the Architecture Prize for the five years from 2004 to 2008, by the Greek Institute of Architecture, 2014, by UIA -International Union prize of Architects- friendly spaces accessible for all for the Regeneration of New Beach in Thessaloniki, by the SADAS-PEA award for four years 2010-2014, the STRUCTURES prize for the best implemented project for the years 2010-2014, while in 2015 the New Beach project was included in final list for the Mies van der Rohe award 2015 and received the award Archmarathon awards 2015. it was preceded by other awards international, pan-European and national competitions, such as the first prize for the competition EUROPAN 2, the first prize for the redesign of the monumental Axis of Aristotle, the first prize for the restoration of New Beach Thessaloniki, the first prize for Academy of Arts and Culture of the Municipality of Kalamaria, Price for the tender for the reconstruction of Athens "Rethink Athens", the a 'award for the rehabilitation of beachfront Naples and Monemvasia etc.
In 2016, they were awarded by the Yan Ye Award Professional Competition and were selected by the AIAC and the A10 to represent Greece at IN practice within the Fuoribiennale Venice. They have taken part in many exhibitions and conferences
|
François Laplantine
Ambiance, common(-)place, common time, place creating connection
Aesthetic transformations of the sensory and aporia of language
Two contradictory trends are apparent in the contemporary world: one tending towards greater uniformity, in architecture, music and such; the other towards further fragmentation. The term ‘globalization’ either causes societies to dissolve, through decreasing differentiation of forms, or to harden in differentialist reaction. But alongside dichotomous rationales – trendy or outdated ambiance, open or closed neighbourhood, innovation or conservation – there is also scope, witness Japan, for a back-and-forth rhythm which contradicts stabilization by means of the principle of identity and deprived third parties.
The becoming of ambiances raises the question of the transformation of space over time. How does time leave an impression on space? How does space express time? Drawing on ethnographic observation of unobtrusive everyday street ambiances in Sao Paulo, Tokyo and Beijing, we shall show that an ambiance is the singular encounter between an environment and a moment, occurring in a (collective) subjectivity involving sharing of the sensory, memory and imagination.
The challenge raised by the theme of the Third International Congress is inextricably epistemological and linguistic. An ambiance cannot be prompted, less still programmed. It is not an ‘object’. It does not unfold in space and time, but generates an unpredictable, indeducible space-time. We cannot ‘have’ an ambiance any more than we are ‘moving’ towards one. An ambiance comes upon us, indivisible, barely expressible yet undeniable. This experience refuses to be broken down into the western dualism of subject and object. Indeed, it is scarcely compatible with the particularity of Indo-European languages in which the grammatical structure of a sentence is driven by a subject of which the position is anterior, exterior and superior, with a tendency to abstract itself from its surroundings, reduced to a mere backdrop. It is impossible to set forth an ambiance, starting from a eurocentric ‘I’, which pre-exists the context and can abstract itself from it. To interrogate the intransitive nature of this experience we shall use the Japanese language, which does not separate subject (shutai), place (basho), setting (fôdo) and connection (ningen). However, despite the difficulty of expressing an ambiance in everyday speech or analysing it – in other words breaking it down – in learned terms (Wittgenstein) – an ambiance can be narrated, sung, danced, filmed and staged. In which case, whatever is no longer represented but rather recreated in this way is another ambiance.
Biography
François Laplantine is Emeritus Professor at Lyon 2 University, France, where he founded the anthropology department. He has carried out most of his research in Brazil, where two universities have awarded him an Honoris Causa degree, but his attention has recently shifted to Japan and China. He has published about 30 books, translated into several languages. Recent publications include Tokyo Ville Flottante, Stock, Paris, 2010; Une Autre Chine, De l’Incidence, St Vincent de Mercuze, 2012; Quand le Moi Devient Autre, CNRS Editions, Paris, 2014; L’Energie Discrète des Lucioles. Anthropologie et Images, L’Harmattan, Paris, 2014; The Life of the Senses: Introduction to a Modal Anthropology, Bloomsbury Academic, 2015; Non. Négation, Négatif, Négativite entre Chine, Japon et Europe, De l’Incidence, 2016.
|
Aglaée Degros
The art of creating relations
The art of creating relations – of connecting spaces, people and “milieux” – will be fundamental qualities of ambiances in the future.
In the past it was limits, autonomous surfaces and borders that were the constitutive elements of urban and rural ambiances. Today we are at the beginning of an era in which problems of relation matter more. Such relations define territory and landscape; they are indispensable to social, economic, ecological and architectural regeneration. New infrastructures such as the Nordbahnstrasse, La Belle-vue Fietssnelweg and Ciclovia Belém illustrate this point.
The modes of action that each of these projects depend on are different from those of project in the past. They are collaborative and do not hesitate to employ tactics involving “guerilla” actions, mock-ups, incremental design approaches, plans for transition as indispensable modalities for the creation of ambiances in the future…
Biography
Aglaée Degros is an architect and the co-founder of Artgineering, an office for urbanism based in Rotterdam (NL) and Brussels (BE). Starting with precise observation of the existing territorial realities the office is at the meeting point of the spatial, social and cultural production of space.
Aglaée Degros is a professor at the Institute of urbanism at Graz TU (Graz University of Technology – Autriche).
|
Marcos Novak
Oh, Ambient Demons: ἰὼ φίλοι δαίμονες, ἀμφιβάντες πόλιν
Ambiances, tomorrow
Already, these words address both space and time. At first reading, they refer to the future of the ambient. But more can be read into them.
For instance, consider equilibrium: if we stand firmly in one spot and try to reach as far forward as we can, we soon have to balance ourselves by reaching equally far back. Standing on the present, trying to reach deeply into the future, we must reach equally deeply into the past.
That’s static equilibrium. If, on the other hand, like Angelus Novus, Walter Benjamin’s past-facing angel, we are thrust into the future by the wind of progress, then no such balance is necessary, at least as long as we keep moving — but, if we stop, we topple. In the blur of our movement, we are blinded —the future is behind us, invisible, and the past, though visible, recedes in pieces, torn to shreds by the storm of advancement. The moment we pause, the moment of potential clarity, is also the moment of collapse.
An ambience is a surrounding. We begin there. Nothing surrounds us as completely as time. We begin there, in time, surrounded. What is the past, present, and future of ambiances?
Ambiancé, the as-yet-incomplete 720-hour experimental film directed by Anders Weberg, will only be shown once, in its entirety, when it is completed; then it will be destroyed. For now, a 72-hour trailer is available. How does one watch a 72-hour trailer, let alone a 720-hour movie? Even more than Christian Marclay’s 24-hour “The Clock,” the only way to watch Ambiancé is to enter its ambiance, to allow fact and fiction to blend into life itself.
Or, consider virtuality — as physical cities crumble or become aggregations of uncorrelated computer-generated forms that reach the sky but neglect the street, corporate body against human body, the coherent architectonic ambiance that permeated actual cities vanish into the cinematic. The architecture of the city is now experienced in movies. The infinite wisdom of the market’s “invisible hand” has decided that it is most efficient to provide atmosphere-in-spectacle and generic utility everywhere else. To this is added the new VR-triumphant, virtual-reality re-emerging from its long wait for the right conditions, finally armed with all the necessary enabling technologies, to a generation prepared to receive it, under perfect conditions. How positive this may be, if it indeed allows us to advance “the poetics of space” — Bachelard’s phenomenological perceptiveness of ambiances, so necessary to a healthy psyche — and still remember to bring back what lessons we learn to the actuality of our lived spaces — and how terrifying it may be, if we use these technologies to further neglect and already overly-neglected world.
Ambiances: the ambient, the Latin ambiens and ambitus, in the end, the ancient Greek αμφιβαίνω (αμφι/amphi/ambi/both sides + βαίνω/vado/to proceed, to encircle), to walk around something, hence to surround it. Words that are related to others we know: amphitheater, amphibious, amphiboly, all about the reconciliation of some kind of two-sidedness that contains the contradiction into a new condition and a new whole.
What is this for our time?
Aeschylus, in “Seven Against Thebes,” has the citizens call upon “ambient demons” to protect the city. Ambient demons, natural forces personified, surround the city as guardians, and the citizens call upon them for protection. We find the same perception in Shinto and in all indigenous cultures that respect their surroundings. And what about us? What of our present, and our future? What demons guard our cities? Is it not clear? Computing daemons, impersonal background processes, armed with machine vision, global senses, artificial intelligence, and the wisdom of the market, all hand and no heart, form an ambiance of surveillance whose stated intention is protection, but whose origin and outcome are paranoia and fear and not reassurance or comfort.
Perhaps our future can learn from our past. Perhaps Aeschylus can teach us something about ambiances:
ἰὼ φίλοι δαίμονες,
Oh beloved demons
λυτήριοί τ᾿ ἀμφιβάντες πόλιν
Atoning for and ambient to the city
δείξαθ᾿ ὡς φιλοπόλεις,
Prove yourselves lovers of cities
μέλεσθε θ᾿ ἱερῶν δαμίων,
Take care of the sacred offerings
μελόμενοι δ᾿ ἀρήξατε·
Accepting them, defend them
φιλοθύτων δέ τοι πόλεος ὀργίων
Being fond of the city’s sacrifices
μνήστορες ἔστε μοι.
Be protectors of them, I ask
[translation mine]
Biography
Professor Marcos Novak is the founding director of the transLAB at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he is affiliated with the AlloSphere and CNSI (the California NanoSystems Institute).
He is a researcher, artist, theorist, and transarchitect. In 2000, he represented Greece at the Venice Biennale, where his works have been exhibited several more times since. His projects have also appeared in prominent museums, galleries, and collections in many countries. He serves on the scientific committees and advisory boards of several international journals and conferences.
His projects, theoretical essays, and interviews have been translated into over twenty languages and have appeared in over 70 countries, and have become the topics of conferences and symposia. He lectures, teaches, and exhibits worldwide.
|
![]() | Ambiances, demain | Ambiances, tomorrow | Ατμόσφαιρες, Αύριο Edited by | Sous la direction de Nicolas Rémy & Nicolas Tixier © International Ambiances Network & University of Thessaly, 2016 1 016 p. (2 volumes) 50 € - ISBN 978‐2‐9520948‐6‐3 ![]() ![]() |
Actes | Proceedings > 2 volumes


|
Liste des auteurs | Index of Authors
ABBAS Yasmine ABU DAYA Amal ABUHN Beata L ALBERTSEN Niels ALVES Susana AMAMOU Ines AMMAR Toumadher ANDERSEN Marilyne ARIZAGA Ximena ATIENZA Ricardo ATTALI Jean ATTIA Amr Abdalla Abdelaziz AUGOYARD Jean‐François BALAMANE Nadia Hamzaoui BALAΫ Olivier BALEZ Suzel BARNIAUDY Clément BEGEL Antoine BEL HAJ HAMOUDA CHERIF Alia BELAKEHAL Azeddine BEN AYED Alia BEN FRAJ Fatma BEN HADJ SALEM Mohsen BENDIB Houda BENKORICHI Oualid BERRENS Karla BODE Imme BOFFI Marco BONICCO‐DONATO Céline BONNET Aurore BOSSÉ Anne BRAYER Laure BREVIGLIERI Marc BUYCK Jennifer CAGLAR Alper Harun CALVET‐MIR Laura CARLES José Luis CASAULT André CHAMILOTHORI Kynthia CHARITOS Dimitris CHELKOFF Grégoire CHIARINI Cecilia CHTARA Chiraz CRUNELLE Marc DAICH Safa DAICHE Ahmed Motie DE MARCO Rosa DEFFNER Alex DEMERS Claude DEROUICHE‐JERBI Malek DESMICHEL Pascal DIMITRIADI Leda DOUTRIAUX Emmanuel DROZD Céline DUARTE Cristiane Rose DUBOS Anne ELVIRA Juan ESCHER Anton FARSØ Mads FAUCON Frédéric FEILDEL Benoit FELIX‐FROMENTIN Clotilde FRIBERG Carsten GALLIGO Igor GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ Pedro José GAUDIBERT Piotr GEISLER Élise GERMON Olivia GHARBI Salma GHOZI Raja GILBERT Jacques Athanaze GOURLOT Nathalie GUILLÉ Marien HASSAN Doaa K. HEIBACH Christiane HUGONNET Christian HUSSEIN Faten JÄGGI Patricia JAIDANE Meriem JEUDY Olivier KAKALIS Christos KARNER Marie KAROUI Hind KAZIG Rainer KERZ Christina KIOUPKIOLIS Alexandros KOIVUMÄKI Ari KONTUKOSKI Maija KYRIAKOPOULOS Leandros KYTÖ Meri LABURTE Dominique LAGO Noémie LALOU Georgia LANDOULSI ATTIA Imen LAPRAY Karine LAROCHE Sylvie LAYEB Sana LE CARRER Héloïse LEBOIS Valérie LEROY Marie LESCOP Laurent LIVENEAU Philippe LLORCA Joaquín LOLIVE Jacques M’HAMMEDI Mouna MACE Valérie MADOEUF Anna MADSEN Theis Vallø MADSEN Tina Anette MANOLA Théa MANTAS Neoklis MARCHAL Théo MARCOU Marie MARGIER Antonin | MARIE Héloïse MASSON Damien McCAFFERTY Conor MEIGNEUX Guillaume MELEMIS Steven MEUNIER Virginie MEZIOU Olfa R. MILLIOT Virginie MINVIELLE Nicolas MONS Alain MONSHIZADE Arezou MORELLO Eugenio MÜLLER Anna‐Lisa MYGDALI Stella OKAMURA Cintia OSBORNE Tess PAGNAC‐BAUDRY Héloïse PALMESE Cristina PARIS Magali PEREZ‐MUNOZ Antoine PERRIER Olivier PETERSEN Rikke Munck PHILIPPE Anne PICHON Pascale PIGA Barbara E A PINHEIRO Ethel PITKÄKOSKI Tuija PLANCHOT Mathilde POIRIER Geneviève POLACK Jean‐Dominique POTVIN André POULAT Olivier R. DONGRE Alpana RAINISIO Nicola RAPP Helena RASPAUD Michel REDONDO Belinda REGNAULT Cécile REMY Nicolas REQUENA‐RUIZ Ignacio RIEDEL Friedlind ROMBACH Emmanuelle ROMIEU Patrick ROUX Jean‐Michel RUNKEL Simon SAADI Mohamed Yacine SAID Noha G. SANCOVSCHI Ilana SAND Monica SAPOUNAKIS Aris SEGAPELI Silvana SERVIÈRES Myriam SIGNORELLI Valerio SIMON Andreas SIMONNOT Nathalie SIRET Daniel SLAMA Imène SOMMERLAD Elisabeth SPANOU Ioanna STEFANOU Danae SUNER Bruno SZÁNTÓ Catherine THEODORSON Judy THEONA Iouliani THIBAUD Jean‐Paul THIOLLIERE Pascaline THULIN Samuel TIAZZOLDI Caterina TIXIER Nicolas TORPUS Jan TORRES ASTABURUAGA Adrián TORRES GARCIA Jesús TOURRE Vincent TOUSSAINT Maïlys TRAGAKI Dafni TRIBOUT Silvère TSAVDAROGLOU Charalampos UIMONEN Heikki VARANO Sandro VASILIKOU Carolina VAYSSIERE Bruno VEGETTI Irene VERMEIRE Geert VYZOVITI Sophia WAHURWAGH Amit J. WHEELER Andrea WIECZOREK Izabela WIENOLD Jan WOLOSZYN Philippe ZAÏRI Mouna ZAVRAKA Despoina ZEMMOURI Noureddine ZIDELMAL Nadia ΓΡΗΓΟΡΙΑΔΟΥ Μαγδαληνή ΔΕΦΝΕΡ Αλέξιος ΖΑΒΙΤΣΑΝΟΥ Αβροκώμη ΚΑΤΣΑΦΑΔΟΥ Σωτηρία ΛΟΥΚΑΚΗΣ Γιώργος ΜΑΝΤΖΟΥ Πολυξένη ΜΑΝΩΛΙΔΗΣ Κώστας ΜΑΡΑΓΚΟΥ Αφροδίτη ΜΕΡΜΙΓΚΗ Δήμητρα ΜΠΑΝΤΟΥΝΑ Δάφνη ΜΠΟΥΡΔΑΚΗΣ Βασίλης ΠΑΞΙΝΟΥ Ευαγγελία ΠΑΠΑΔΗΜΗΤΡΙΟΥ Σπύρος Ι. ΠΑΠΑΔΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ Σπύρος ΠΑΥΛΙΔΗ Ναταλία ΠΡΙΓΚΟΥ Σταματία ΤΟΛΟΥΔΗ Ζηνοβία ΤΣΑΚΙΡΗ Ευφροσύνη ΧΑΤΖΗΣΑΒΒΑ Δήμητρα ΧΡΟΝΑΚΗ Μυρτώ |
|